![]() ![]() The new Ophelia (“the one the river didn’t keep”) refuses Yorick’s grave to accept his role as the Fool “who” – to say it with the words of Jungian analyst W. Müller’s destruction and reconstruction of Shakespeare’s Hamlet. After an excursus on the development of Ophelia’s literary myth, my paper will focus on the central function ascribed to Ophelia’s madness in H. This study recommends that religion should be considered the persistent approach for his delay because he not only owns it in his faith but also plays it in his actions.Ībstract “Mythologized over time, Ophelia has attained the status of a cult figure to such an extent that she has become a cliché” (C. The data collected were analyzed taking into consideration Augustine’s view for a systematic result. The findings clearly describe Hamlet religious and demonstrate his religiosity as his tragic flaw. The significance of “Faith and Reason” is highly influenced in Hamlet’s character. To Augustine, both “Faith and Reason”, have their basics from religious concepts. To carry out this study, the research was qualitatively employed and the findings were analyzed in accordance with Augustinian concept “Faith and Reason”. His faith is the consequence of his true self that determines him internally and externally both. Faith in Hamlet is like a photographic through which he grasps his surrounding and grapples with his objects. His expression of thought and reasoning are ostensibly purified by his religious faith. He is faithful to God, sincere in activities and wholly plays deeds in the boundary of his religion. ![]() It aims at exploring his actions, dialogs, conducts, expression, reasoning and faith in the light of religious perspective. This study aims to examine Shakespearean the most complex yet iconic character Hamlet’s religiosity as the reason of his tragic flaw and catastrophic end and discovers religion as more superior to any other undertaking for Hamlet. Hamlet’s delay for taking the revenge is a widely discussed object that still seems to be replicable. By doing so, it is aimed to evince and embody Shakespeare's effect over Kısakürek and his work, Bir Adam Yaratmak, which is both an original play in Turkish Literature and an adaptation of Shakespeare's Hamlet in terms of its success in the internalization process of the universal values and problems, presented by Shakespeare. To specify Shakespeare's effect over Kısakürek, this article aims to analyse the similarities and differences between the two plays, Bir Adam Yaratmak by Necip Fazıl Kısakürek and Hamlet by William Shakespeare, in terms of characterization, plot, and themes such as madness, alienation to the community, existence vs. There are various effective Western representatives in Turkish Literature however, Shakespeare's impact has been so powerful that Turkish writers, one of which is Necip Fazıl Kısakürek, considered him as a model and followed some specific issues about his writings. In the route of modernization, people attached much more importance to the West, thus gave it way to permeate into the lives and correspondingly, to the literature of a nation. After the Reorganization Period (Tanzimat Dönemi), roughly between 18 during the reign of the Ottoman Empire, the effects of West over Turkish Literature increased more and more.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |